Legal Opinion
Reed v. Church
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided April 8, 1940No. Record No. 2189PublishedCited by 32 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.
An action at law was instituted by Albert T. Church against Nr. James W. Reed for injuries alleged to have resulted to his eyes from improper medical treatment. A verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, Church, was obtained in the trial court.
On October 16, 1928, Mr. Church became unconscious and remained so for thirty days. Dr. Reed was called to treat him and undertook to diagnose the disease. Dr. Reed, is and has been for many years a reputable physician practicing in Norfolk and vicinity. His educational qualifications and experience as a physician have been good. He is what is commonly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hunter v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Fox v. MasonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
- Alexander v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- United Dentists, Inc. v. BryanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
- Ropp v. StevensSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
3Cited by32 opinions
- Harry J. Hicks, Administrator of the Estate of Carol Greitens, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Brown v. KoulizakisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Russell T. Fitzgerald v. Preston C. Manning, Jr., M. D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Roberson v. CounselmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Danville Community Hospital, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.