Legal Opinion

Warren E. Hanvey v. W. D. Blankenship, H. E. Thompson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 25, 1980No. 79-6514PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Warren Hanvey seeks return of the $750 that prison officials confiscated from him as contraband following its discovery in his possession during a routine prison shakedown. Because prison regulations explicitly prohibit unauthorized possession of any United States currency, prison officials, having found Hanvey guilty of the violation, placed the $750 in the Inmate Canteen Fund. The district court held that this forfeiture did not violate Hanvey’s constitutional right not to be deprived of property without due process. We affirm.

When statutory authority…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dennis Sell and Edward Konder v. Robert F. Parratt, Warden, Nebraska Penal and Correctional ComplexCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. Hanvey v. BlankenshipDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1979

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. William F. Washlefske v. Andrew J. Winston Ronald J. AngeloneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  2. In Re Petition of SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Bryant v. BarbaraCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1986
  4. Savko v. RollinsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1990
  5. Washlefske v. WinstonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API