Legal Opinion
State v. Rose
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided February 24, 1992PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Justice.
The defendant, who was confined in an Arizona prison at the time of his Maine indictment and was returned to Maine to stand trial pursuant to the Interstate Compact on Detainers (ICD), appeals his convictions in the Superior Court (York County, Brodrick, J.). He contends that his trial did not start within the 180-day time period prescribed by the ICD and that inculpatory statements he made to the police officer bringing him back to Maine should not have been admitted at trial. We find no violation of the ICD but conclude that defendant’s statements should have been…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Clark v. LongMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- State of Maine v. Carine ReevesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022
- State v. HarperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Bland, D.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.