State v. Harper
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
Patricia Harper appeals her conviction for the 1985 murder of Richard Pinard entered in the Superior Court (Aroostook County, Pierson, J.) after a jury trial. We vacate defendant’s conviction and remand the case for a new trial because the State’s introduction at trial of an inculpatory statement made by defendant to a DHS worker so violated her Sixth Amendment right to counsel and the prophylactic rule of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), that defendant was deprived of a fair trial. We disagree, however, with defendant’s contention that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. WarrenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Dennis F. Winchester v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
- Blanton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
- State v. KnowltonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- State v. HarperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.