Legal Opinion
Dial Corp. v. Manghnani Investment Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 19, 1987No. Civ. B 86-180 (TFGD)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DALY, Chief Judge.
After review and absent objection, the proposed ruling of the Magistrate is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED, and RATIFIED.
Feb. 10, 1987.
THOMAS P. SMITH, United States Magistrate.
This is an action for damages and injunctive relief arising from alleged violations of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. § 1526; the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114(l)(a) and 1125(a); the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, Conn.Gen. Stat. § 42-110(b) (“CUTPA”); the Connecticut Trademarks and Service Marks Act, Conn.Gen.Stat. § 35-1 la et seq.; and Connecticut’s common law of trademark infringement and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- American International Group, Inc. v. London American International Corporation Limited and Midland Bank LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Manufacturers Technologies, Inc. v. Cams, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
- Weil Ceramics & Glass, Inc. v. DashCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Miles, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. KayeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
- Weil Ceramics And Glass, Inc. v. Bernard DashCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.