Yancey v. Gillespie
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
Boiled down to its essence, the article complained of says the editor is informed the city council, by a vote of four to two, with the verbal backing of the mayor, has purchased a “shabby” lot in Gastonia for $3,000; “that the purchase is not a bargain,” but is a “wasteful and non-arbitrated use of public money”; that the editor of the paper believes the deal smells. The clause underscored is the only reference to the plaintiff. The article charges that a majority of the council had the verbal backing of the mayor; that is, that he approved the action of the council in making the purchase.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hoeppner v. Dunkirk Printing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Ramsey v. . CheekSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Fields v. . BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Gattis v. Kilgo.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Hartsfield v. Harvey C. Hines Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wilson v. McClennySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Clark v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Edmonds v. Delta Democrat Publishing Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1957
- RH Bouligny, Inc. v. United Steelworkers of Amer.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Tyson v. L'Eggs Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.