Legal Opinion

Harrell v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 16, 1936No. 141210PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Baker.

On October 22, 1934, respondent undertook to commence his action in tort against Sears, Roebuck & Co.; the second paragraph of the complaint being as follows: “2. That the defendant is a large and very wealthy firm or corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of one of the states of the United States, and said defendant owns and operates thousands of chain stores throughout this country and elsewhere and is worth many millions of dollars; that one of the aforesaid chain stores is located in Richland County,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lipe v. C. C. & O. Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. Bass v. American Products Export & I. Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  3. Pollock v. B. & L. Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  4. State of South Carolina v. W.T. Rawleigh Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  5. Jenkins v. Penn Bridge Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bargesser v. Coleman Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  2. Morrison v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API