Legal Opinion

Orzel v. Scott Drug Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1995No. 98506, (Calendar No. 1)PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.

In this case, we are asked to determine whether plaintiffs can maintain a tort action where plaintiffs’ asserted injuries arose out of illegal conduct on the part of one of the plaintiffs, the plaintiff’s culpability is equal to the defendant’s and the plaintiff’s alleged entitlement to recovery is not provided for under the statutes claimed to have been violated by the defendant. We hold that, under such circumstances, the plaintiffs are precluded from bringing their action.

In this case, we have also been asked to articulate the scope of a pharmacist’s duty when filling prescriptions issued…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Eagle, Star & British Dominions Insurance v. HellerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  2. Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hardy v. Monsanto Enviro-Chem Systems, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Lichon v. American Universal InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Longstreth v. GenselMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Sniecinski v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Forge v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Price v. Purdue Pharma Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2006

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API