Legal Opinion

State v. Stott

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1998No. A-97-641PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hannon, Judge.

After a bench trial in county court, Cheri L. Stott was convicted of violation of a Lincoln city ordinance and sentenced, in part, to imprisonment. Having found a violation of Stott’s right to counsel, the district court affirmed Stott’s conviction but reversed her sentence and remanded the matter with direction to modify Stott’s sentence by deleting the provisions relating to imprisonment. Because the proper remedy for a violation of the right to counsel, in cases other than felonies, is to affirm the conviction but reverse or vacate the sentence, we now affirm the judgment of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. StottNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. RubekNebraska Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. State v. GoldenNebraska Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API