Legal Opinion

(PC) McCaa v. FCI-Herlong

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 7, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01191Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CEDRIGUEZ MCCAA 2:24-cv-1191-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 FCI-HERLONG, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Cedriguez McCaa, a federal prisoner, proceeds without counsel and requests to 18 proceed in forma pauperis. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302. See 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). For screening purposes, the complaint states a claim against Dr. Allred under 20 Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971), based on 21 allegations of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API