Legal Opinion

McFarlen v. Eckhart

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1993No. 93CE0016PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge METZGER.

The sole issue in this workers’ compensation ease is whether the filing of a petition for rehearing is a necessary procedural step for seeking further review in the supreme court when a petition for certiorari has been denied by this court. We conclude that such a filing is not required, and thus, we dismiss the petition for rehearing filed by claimant.

On November 4, 1993, we denied the petition for certiorari filed by Connie J. McFar-len, claimant. Thereafter, claimant filed a petition for rehearing with this court.

Procedural rules relating to the same subject are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Regional Transportation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Moran v. CarlstromSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. Sterling v. Industrial Com'n of StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Welch v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATE OF COLO.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. A.J.H.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Anheuser Busch, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. People Ex Rel. AjhColorado Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API