Legal Opinion

Dollard v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 3, 2003No. 712,2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice.

In this appeal we consider the admissibility of evidence of the prior convictions of a witness under Delaware Uniform Rules of Evidence 404(b) and 609(a). The defendant contends that the proffered evidence was admissible under the exceptions to the general rule barring admission of prior bad act evidence found in Rule 404(b) or, alternatively, as impeachment evidence under Rule 609(a). Because the evidence did not relate to a material fact at issue in the case, we hold that the evidence was not admissible under Rule 404(b). In addition, we hold that evidence of the prior…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  2. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  3. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  4. Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  2. Bentley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  3. Coles v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  4. Binaird v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  5. Hull v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API