Legal Opinion

Binaird v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 23, 2009No. 240, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice.

Defendant-Appellant Andre Binaird appeals from his Superior Court conviction of assault second degree and possession of a deadly weapon during the commission of a felony. 1 Binaird contends the Superior Court abused its discretion and violated his right to confront and crossexamine the complaining witness on how painful the complaining witness’s injuries may have been. Binaird argues that absent this error, he could not have been convicted of the felony charges and sentenced as a habitual offender under 11 Del. C. § 4214(a). We find no merit to his argument, and thus, we…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  3. Weber v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  4. Tyre v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  5. Snowden v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williamson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  2. MUMITT v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. Binaird v. PierceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2013
  4. Binaird v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  5. Kulowiec v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API