Legal Opinion

United States v. Daniels

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided June 28, 2004No. 03-0614/NA; Crim.App. 200001604PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was charged with a single specification of wrongful cocaine possession, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a (2000). Prior to trial, Appellant moved to suppress the sole piece of Government evidence—a vial of cocaine retrieved by his roommate (Seaman Apprentice (SA) Yoitlein) from a nightstand drawer used by Appellant, at the direction of the Military Training Instructor Leading Chief Petty Officer, Chief Wilt, on the ground that the retrieval of the evidence violated Appellant’s Fourth Amendment reasonable expectation of privacy. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. WicksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
  2. United States v. BufordCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  3. United States v. FloresCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  4. United States v. MichaelCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  5. United States v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API