Wren v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KURT S. ODENWALD, Presiding Judge.
Introduction
Gene Wren (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an eviden-tiary hearing, of his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. This Court affirmed Movant’s convictions, following a jury trial, of leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident, in violation of Section 577.060, RSMo 2000, 1 careless and imprudent driving, in violation of Section 304.012, and driving without a valid license, in violation of Section 302.020. State v. Wren, 276 S.W.3d 880 (Mo.App. E.D.2009). We affirm the motion court’s denial of Movant’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Storey v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- Gehrke v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Forrest v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tucker v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- King v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Mason v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Robert Childs v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Anthony Balbirnie v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.