Legal Opinion

Wren v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 2010No. ED 93732PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KURT S. ODENWALD, Presiding Judge.

Introduction

Gene Wren (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an eviden-tiary hearing, of his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. This Court affirmed Movant’s convictions, following a jury trial, of leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident, in violation of Section 577.060, RSMo 2000, 1 careless and imprudent driving, in violation of Section 304.012, and driving without a valid license, in violation of Section 302.020. State v. Wren, 276 S.W.3d 880 (Mo.App. E.D.2009). We affirm the motion court’s denial of Movant’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Storey v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  4. Gehrke v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. Forrest v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tucker v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. King v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Mason v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Robert Childs v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Anthony Balbirnie v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API