Legal Opinion

Katelyn Anderson, on behalf of herself and similarly situated employees v. Vitac Corporation

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided January 22, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00329Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 25-cv-00329-PAB-NRN KATELYN ANDERSON, on behalf of herself and similarly situated employees, Plaintiff, v. VITAC CORPORATION, Defendant. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement [Docket No. 74]. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. I. BACKGROUND On January 31, 2025, plaintiff Katelyn Anderson filed her complaint on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated against…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API