Lunn v. F. W. Woolworth Co. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Lunn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
In the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, in an action for damages for infringing a patent, plaintiff, Annette S. Lunn, obtained a verdict and a judgment against defendant, F. W. Woolworth Company, for $10,938 and costs. Plaintiff moved to amend the judgment by increasing the amount thereof. Defendant moved to set aside the verdict and for a judgment in its favor notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. An order was entered denying both motions. Plaintiff appealed from that part of the order which denied her motion. Defendant appealed from the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Northern Indiana Oil Co. Moore v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Columbia Motor Car Co. v. C. A. Duerr & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- Edison v. American Mutoscope Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
- Land Oberoesterreich v. GudeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Jenkins Petroleum Process Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Spriggs Enterprises, Inc. v. Purcell Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Baker v. Exxon Mobile CorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- The Exxon Valdez v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- The Exxon Valdez v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009