Legal Opinion

Cooley v. Fredinburg

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 13, 1996No. 88-0971-J-1; CA A89024PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Appellant Fredinburg appeals from a judgment dismissing his claim for restitution against respondent Hogue Investments (Hogue) and awarding judgment against him for $14,581, representing the surplus proceeds from a previous foreclosure sale of Fredinburg’s property. We reverse.

Fredinburg is the owner of real property that was subject to several liens. The senior lienholder, Cooley, filed a complaint for foreclosure and joined as defendants all junior lienholders as well as Fredinburg. One of the junior lienholders was the Federal Deposit and Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Cooley’s complaint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lytle v. Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Hood River County v. DabneyOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Scarth v. ScarthOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Dickerson v. MurfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Wood v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hiber v. Creditors Collection Service of Lincoln County, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Kroupa v. KroupaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Weatherspoon v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Montoya v. Housing Authority of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Skeen v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API