Legal Opinion

State v. Kalebaugh

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2015No. 89971-1PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYu, J.

¶1 Chadwick Leonard Kalebaugh appeals his first degree child molestation conviction and claims reversible error based on the trial judge’s misstatements regarding the meaning of “reasonable doubt” in his preliminary remarks to the jury venire. Kalebaugh did not object and raises the issue for the first time on appeal. We reach the unpreserved error because it is a manifest constitutional error under RAP 2.5(a)(3), but we affirm because the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

Facts and Procedural History

¶2 On October 28, 2011, Kristal Strong had a birthday party for her son at their…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. EmeryWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. FarnsworthWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. SchiermanWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. DuncanWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. GrottWashington Supreme Court · 2020

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API