Legal Opinion

State v. Farnsworth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 2016No. 91297-1PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

¶1 Robbery and theft are closely related crimes. While both offenses involve stealing money or property, theft is elevated to robbery where the defendant uses force or threatened force to take the property. The main question in this case is whether certain conduct constituted a “threat of force,” making the crime a robbery, not a theft. The legislature has broadly defined “threat” to specifically include “indirect [ ]” threats. RCW 9A.04-.110(28). We have established in our case law that a threat need not be explicit to qualify—a threat can be implied by words or conduct. As we recently held,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. McKenzy Alfred v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. State of Washington v. Marshall DisneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. State Of Washington, V. Navin Avery MilkoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
  5. Edelin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2024

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API