Wylie v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly directed defendant to produce the entire contents of its internal accident investigation file. Defendant’s argument that plaintiffs’ discovery requests are overly broad is not properly before this Court. That argument was not raised before Supreme Court. In any event, there is no merit to that argument (see, Engel v Hagedorn, 170 AD2d 301; Sisters of St. Francis of Holy Name Province v Daemen Coll., 168 AD2d 897).
We further reject defendant’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harris v. Processed Wood, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Helfant v. RappoportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Calkins v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Engel v. HagedornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Morris v. FeinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Agovino v. Taco Bell 5083Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Sigelakis v. Washington Group, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Beaumont v. SmythAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Blakesley v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Pendergast v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.