Agovino v. Taco Bell 5083
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*570Although we agree with the result reached by the Supreme Court, we do not agree with that court’s reasoning.
The plaintiff allegedly sustained physical injuries as a result of drinking an iced tea sold by the defendant Taco Bell 5083 (hereinafter the defendant) which appears to have been tainted by a cleaning solution intended to sanitize the defendant’s brewing and dispensing equipment. The employees of the defendant apparently followed routine procedures and notified the defendant’s liability insurance carrier, The Travelers, via a toll-free telephone number. The Travelers assigned a claim…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Koump v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Crazytown Furniture, Inc. v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- James v. Metro North Commute RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Matos v. Akram & Jamal Meat Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Merrick v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Claverack Cooperative Insurance v. NielsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Sigelakis v. Washington Group, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Kin Hwa Ku v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Geffner v. Mercy Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Donohue v. FokasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.