Legal Opinion
Beaumont v. Smyth
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 13, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Garni, J.), entered September 12, 2002, which granted plaintiff’s motion seeking to compel disclosure.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying that part of plaintiff’s motion seeking to compel disclosure of the Lester report and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted that part of plaintiff’s motion seeking to compel Michael P. Smyth and Federal Express Corporation (Fed Ex) (defendants) to disclose…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vernet v. GilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Recant v. HarwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Tenebruso v. Toys "R" Us—NYTEX, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Sullivan v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Hannold v. First Baptist ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- JOHNSON, TREVOR v. MURPHY, ALEXA L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Celani v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017