Legal Opinion

Cheatham v. Hogan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1908No. 7355PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered December 26, 1907, upon granting a nonsuit, after a trial before the court and a jury, in an action for personal injuries sustained by an employee in the fall of a scaffold:

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondents, in 1906 and 1907, constructed a five-story brick building in the city of Spokane, on property owned by them. E. J. Cheatham was the general superintendent of the work, and directed the construction work generally. One Ridpath, a carpenter, was the carpenters’ foreman, and laid out and directed the carpenter work. The appellant was a brother of the superintendent, and was employed about the building as a common laborer; it being his duty to do any sort of work he might be directed to do. The building was constructed with a light well near its center, approximately 15x45 in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Liedke v. Moran Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Metzler v. McKenzieWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. McBeath v. RawleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  4. McBeath v. RawleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Stevens v. HoweNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Parker v. Pantages Theater Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Barnsdall Oil Co. v. OhlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. McKenzie v. North Coast Colliery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Muehlman v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Swanson v. Sound Construction & Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API