Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Asociación De Subscripción Conjunta Del Seguro De Responsabilidad Obligatorio v. Flores Galarza

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 1, 2007No. 05-1430Published

1Concurring in the judgmentHoward, Circuit Judge

One part of this appeal concerns a takings claim under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the federal Constitution against Juan Flores Galarza, a state official acting in his individual capacity, for withholding millions of dollars from the JUA, a state-created pool of insurers. The lead opinion concludes that a viable takings claim may exist against state officials acting in their individual capacities, but that Flores Galarza is entitled to qualified immunity because his withholding funds was reasonable in light of the unique circumstances present. Ante at 97-98. I am not entirely…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API