Honeycutt v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.
Section 8682 of the Code 1923 provides:
“The concurrence of at least twelve grand jurors is necessary to find an indictment; and when so found it must be indorsed ‘A true bill,’ and the indorsement signed by the foreman.”
The purported indictment contained in this record fails to show a compliance with the mandatory requirement of the statute, supra. There is no indorsement “A true bill” on the indictment. That the indorsement is necessary to a proper authentication of the indictment, and that the requirement of the statute is mandatory, has been held in many decisions of this court and the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex parte WinstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Whitley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- McMullen v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
- Veal v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Hill v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Layton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
- Sanford v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935