Legal Opinion

Gelling v. Golden Arrow Farms

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1951No. 31617PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

This action was originally instituted against the respondents. Pursuant to a stipulation, the court made an order dismissing the action against Golden Arrow Farms and making Daniel Sloan and wife parties defendant. It was made to appear- that William Dunn and Daniel Sloan were partners and owned and operated a milk delivery business. Albert E. Gelling will be referred to as though he were the only appellant, and William Dunn and Daniel Sloan will be referred to as respondents.

The purpose of the action was to recover damages sustained by appellant arising out of a collision between an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Graham v. RoderickWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Spokane & Eastern Branch of Seattle First National Bank v. Justice Court for Spokane PrecinctWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Winningham v. PhilbrickWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Bulette v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. In Re Kessler's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mina v. Boise Cascade Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Latimer v. Western MacHinery ExchangeWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Bowen v. BaumgardnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  4. Gelling v. Golden Arrow FarmsWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Mina v. Boise Cascade Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API