Sanitoy, Inc. v. Ilco Unican Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.
At issue is the fee shifting provision of § 15 of the Massachusetts Oil and Hazardous Material Release Prevention Act, G. L. c. 21E (1990 ed.) (Act). We consider whether § 15, entitled “Citizen Enforcement,” authorizes a trial judge to award attorneys’ fees and expert witness fees in a private party suit for reimbursement brought pursuant to § 4 of the Act. We affirm this portion of the judgment and hold that it does authorize such fees. We also consider whether the judge erred in awarding only a percentage of otherwise reasonable attorneys’ fees and expert witness fees to a party entitled to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- General Electric Company v. Litton Industrial Automation Systems, Inc. And Litton Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Dedham Water Company and Dedham-Westwood Water District v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Sheehy v. Lipton Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. ClubMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bank v. Thermo Elemental Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Oliveira v. PereiraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Martignetti v. Haigh-Farr, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Griffith v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Thomas & Betts Corporation v. Alfa Laval, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.