Valentine v. . Conner
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial district, granting a new trial and reversing judgment for the plaintiff.
Read the full summary
Appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial district, granting a new trial and reversing judgment for the plaintiff. The object of the action was to obtain the cancellation of certain notes, made by the plaintiff and delivered to the defendants, and of a chattel mortgage given to secure their payment, and also to recover the value of the property sold under the power in the mortgage, the proceeds of which had been applied to the satisfaction of the notes. Both claims were based on the allegation that the notes and mortgage were…
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Assuming that the notes of the defendants were given to the plaintiff and accepted by him as a loan of money, the transaction, as found by the referee, cannot be considered usurious. He has fully set forth the facts on which he found, "as a matter of law, that said loan of money and said notes given therefor, and the said mortgage…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Clarke v. . SheehanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Hoffman v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Ferdon v. Zarriello Bros. Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Dygert v. Vermont Loan & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- Leibovici v. RawickiCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.