Legal Opinion

Leibovici v. Rawicki

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided June 5, 1968PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarold Baer, J.

This action is to recover the sum of $5,000 with interest from the date of the demand for the return of that sum. The parties entered into a written agreement prepared by the defendant on October 30, 1961 whereby plaintiffs deposited with defendant $3,000 for the purpose of investing same. Defendant guaranteed the return of the money upon three months’ written notice. On January 2, 1963 plaintiffs gave defendant an additional $2,000 upon the same terms and similar written agreement. The defense is that the agreements were usurious.

The agreement is set forth in full:

‘ ‘ I, the above, have this…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Condit v. . BaldwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Orvis v. . CurtissNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Grannis v. . StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Quackenbos v. . SayerNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Rosenstein v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Venture Mortgage Fund, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  2. Cusick v. IfshinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
  3. Tuition Plan, Inc. v. ZicariSuffolk County District Court · 1972
  4. Heimbinder v. BerkovitzNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Funding Group, Inc. v. Water Chef, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API