People v. Mendez
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The prosecutor has filed this interlocutory appeal, seeking reversal of the trial court’s order granting defendant’s pretrial motion to suppress his statement to the police on the ground that he was not given Miranda 1 warnings before police questioning. The trial court determined that the police questioning of defendant at the police station constituted a custodial interrogation. We reverse.
In reviewing suppression hearing findings, this Court will defer to the trial court’s findings of historical fact, absent clear error. People v Cheatham, 453 Mich 1, 29-30 (Boyle, J.), 44 (Weaver, J.);…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- People v. CheathamMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. HoagMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. HerndonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. MarsackMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. CoomerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. ZahnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. HallMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.