Legal Opinion

Wood v. Korn

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 20, 1993No. CX-93-152PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHULTZ, Judge. *

Appellant Gary Wood brought this personal injury action against two of his co-employees, respondents Paul Korn and Duane Kloncz. Wood appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Korn and Kloncz. We affirm.

FACTS

Wood was employed by Resistance Technology, Inc. (RTI), as a machine operator. Kloncz was the first shift supervisor, and Korn was the lead supervisor.

Wood worked the second shift, and operated press number 7, an injection molding press which was approximately 30 years old. Press number 7 was considered a “joke” around the company and a “piece…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Larson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Dawley v. ThisiusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Terveer v. Norling Bros. Silo Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Nelson v. Rodgers Hydraulic Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. DataCard Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
  2. Stelling v. Hanson Silo Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Banovetz v. KingDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  4. Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API