Legal Opinion
STATE EX REL. VAN HOUT v. Endicott
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided September 13, 2006No. 2004AP1192-WPublished
1Opinion of the Court
721 N.W.2d 531 (2006)
STATE of Wisconsin ex rel. Perry VAN HOUT, Petitioner,
v.
Jeffrey ENDICOTT Warden and Redgranite Correctional Institution, Respondents.
No. 2004AP1192-W.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
September 13, 2006.
Before SNYDER, P.J., BROWN and ANDERSON, JJ.
¶ 1 PER CURIAM.
Perry Van Hout, by counsel, petitions for a writ of habeas corpus under State v. Knight, 168 Wis.2d 509, 484 N.W.2d 540 (1992). Van Hout contends that he was deprived of an appeal by his appointed appellate counsel's actions and this court's decision to permit appointed appellate counsel to withdraw. Van Hout seeks…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. KnightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Flores v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.