Legal Opinion

National City Bank v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1942No. 13945PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

We will consider first the questions raised by the motion for new trial. The cross-action having been stricken on demurrer, only two issues remained for trial: (1) Whether the note and indorsement, neither being under seal, were barred by the statute of limitations; (2) whether the indorsement was in effect a contract of suretyship, and thus invalid under the law of this State, the indorser being at the time a married woman.

In replying to these alleged defenses, the plaintiff offered testimony of its vice-president, C. F. Zukoski, as to…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Frost v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Goldwater v. OltmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Slaton v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  4. Trustees of Jesse Parker Williams Hospital v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. King v. BriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. King v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  2. Bingham v. Advance Industrial Security, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Gulf Collateral, Inc. v. MorganDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1976
  4. Siefferman v. PeppersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Heath v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API