Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lo Piccolo v. Knight of Rest Products Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 1959Published

1Dissent

Bergan, J. (dissenting).

Although defendant gave no proof of the manner of occurrence of the accident, it did not happen in a factual vacuum; and there are enough facts in the record fairly to sustain a finding of negligence without resting the case entirely on pure inference that its naked occurrence alone imputed negligence.

It is fair to infer that the undue speed of defendant’s truck in view of the surface and traffic conditions on Manhattan Bridge at the time of the accident was an element in the occurrence. The plaintiffs’ vehicle was traveling in the lane on its farthest right in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Galbraith v. BuschNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Lahr v. TirrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Cole v. SwaglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Locicero v. MessinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  5. Bennett v. EdwardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API