Legal Opinion
Locicero v. Messina
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 8, 1933PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.
The action is to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by both plaintiffs resulting from a single accident. The defendant Sciascia was not served.
The testimony of the plaintiffs was to the effect that on December 2, 1929, while walking on the sidewalk of Bay street, in Staten Island, they were struck by the truck of the defendant Messina, driven by the defendant Sciascia, his employee. The plaintiffs testified that immediately after the accident they mounted the truck and were driven to the ferry in the town of St. George, where Sciascia gave to each plaintiff a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Hull v. . LittauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Second National Bank v. WestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Chapin-Owen Co. v. YeomanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
3Cited by14 opinions
- Neumann v. Metropolitan Tobacco Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959
- Schwartz v. Sar Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
- Lo Piccolo v. Knight of Rest Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Kohler v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- Rapp v. PUB. SERVICE COORDINATED TRANSPORT, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.