Legal Opinion

Gunn v. Riely

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 21, 2015No. 45177-8-IIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

fl — Terry and Petra Riely appeal the trial court’s judgment awarding damages to Robert Gunn for timber trespass on Gunn’s property. The Rielys argue that the trial court erred when it (1) applied RCW 4.24.630, the waste statute, instead of RCW 64.12.030, the timber trespass statute; (2) did not consider the Rielys’ affirmative defense that Oasis Well Drilling was liable; and (3) did not consider whether the Rielys had an implied easement. Because the trial court incorrectly applied the waste statute, RCW 4.24.630, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Lee, J.

FACTS

¶2 Gunn and the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Porter v. KirkendollWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State Public Disclosure Comm, V Food Democracy ActionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. Jerry Porter And Karen Zimmer, V Curtis & Pepper KirkendollCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. Elliott Bay Asset Solutions v. James B. Nutter & Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. Floyd And Margaret Scott, V Ally Bank Corp., EtalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API