Legal Opinion

Steven W. Vennemann v. Badger Mutual Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 2, 2003No. 02-3677PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

Steven Vennemann was denied coverage under a homeowner’s policy with Badger Mutual Insurance Company (Badger) after his house was damaged in a fire. The district court 2 granted Badger’s motion for summary judgment, finding that Ven-nemann was properly denied coverage due to a vacancy exclusion clause in the insurance policy. Vennemann appeals, arguing that his property was not vacant for sixty consecutive days before the fire. In the alternative, he contends that a construction exception in the vacancy exclusion clause allows him to recover on his insurance claim. We…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Catalina Enterprises, Incorporated Pension Trust v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, and Jennings Insurance Associates, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  3. Breanne Bennett v. Hidden Valley Golf and Ski, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  4. American Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Mildred DurrenceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Will Realty Corp. v. Transportation InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. TRB Investments, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Qwest Communications Co. v. Free Conferencing Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
  3. West American Insurance v. HernandezDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009
  4. Rojas v. Scottsdale InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Pella Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API