Legal Opinion
Danby v. Osteopathic Hospital Ass'n
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided November 18, 1953PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bramhall, Vice-Chancellor:
For the purpose of the motions in this case the following facts as alleged in the complaint and affidavits, are pertinent:
The Osteopathic Hospital Association of Delaware, hereafter called “defendant”, was desirous of remodeling the building known as the Sellers Mansion into a hospital building. Plaintiff was president of its board of trustees from 1949 until his resignation on May 22, 1953. He was also quite active for several years in the solicitation of funds for the erection of an osteopathic hospital. At the direction of the board of trustees plans for the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
- Schumm v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Affiliated Enterprises, Inc. v. WallerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
- Morgan v. WellsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Wilmington Trust Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Danby v. Osteopathic Hospital Ass'n of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
- Laventhol, Krekstein, Horwath & Horwath v. TuckmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
- David J. Greene & Co. v. Schenley Industries, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1971
- Fish Engineering Corporation v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.