In re Naletsky
District Court, D. Connecticut
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Morris Naletsky, bankrupt. Proceedings certified by the referee to obtain a ruling as to the obligation of the bankrupt to file schedules, to deliver assets, and to answer questions propounded. Matter referred to referee, with instructions.
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, District Judge.
Upon the examination before the referee the bankrupt refused to file his schedules, or to answer questions relative to his assets and liabilities, or the whereabouts of any of his .property, or to give any information which would enable the trustee to take possession of his property, or to proceed with the administration of the estate. The referee accordingly certified the proceedings to the court for the purpose of obtaining a ruling as to the obligation of the bankrupt — (1) to file schedules pursuant to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act; (2) to comply with the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- People Ex Rel. Taylor v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Matter of HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McCarthy v. ArndsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. EpsteinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931