Legal Opinion

Keith v. Woodworth

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 11, 1940No. 8379PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Circuit Judge.

Appeal from a judgment of no cause of action against appellants on their petition for refund of taxes alleged to have been illegally collected. Jury trial was waived, and the court rendered judgment in favor of the appellee upon the ground that appellants were barred from recovery by § 611 of the Revenue Act of 1928, 45 Stat. 791, 26 U.S. C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 461, and were not proper parties to maintain the suit.

The facts are stipulated and neither the amount nor the legality of the assessment is questioned. The stipulation in substance shows that Detroit Pressed Steel…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Stahmann v. VidalSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Clift & Goodrich, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  4. Ohio Locomotive Crane Co. v. DenmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
  5. Pingree v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parsons v. AnglimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  2. Louis Deniro, Frank Deniro and Michael Deniro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  3. Parsons v. AnglimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API