Legal Opinion
Fagan v. City of Vineland
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 30, 1992No. Civ. A. 90-310 (WGB)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASSLER, District Judge:
Defendants the City of Vineland, the Vineland Police Department, Chief of Police Joseph P. Cassisi, Police Captain Mario R. Brunetta, Officer David Tesoroni, Officer Beny Velez, Officer Richard Putnam, Officer Phillip Bocelli, and Officer Peter Cocearo III (the “Vineland defendants”) have filed five motions seeking summáry judgment.
The first motion asks for summary judgment in favor of all the Vineland defendants on the plaintiffs’ claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983' alleging a Fourteenth Amendment violation, arguing that the claim may only proceed as a Fourth…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fagan v. City of VinelandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Fagan v. City of VinelandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Africa v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Tice v. CramerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Carroll v. Borough of State CollegeDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.