Legal Opinion

Co-Vest Corp. v. Corbett

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1987No. 19334PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT DANIELS, District Judge:

The law that is applicable in this case is governed by Rule 52(a) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. A trial court’s factual findings will be affirmed unless they are clearly erroneous.

The point at issue is the construction of a written document. The document is a receipt of partial payment on a judgment with a promise to terminate a sheriff’s sale and release part of the real estate securing the judgment. The document also includes the following:

This will further acknowledge that you have tendered as full and final settlement the amount of $35,000.00,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Messick v. PHD Trucking Service, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Dugger v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. West Valley City v. Majestic Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  2. Shields v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  3. Brigham City v. Mantua TownCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  4. Matter of Estate of JustheimCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  5. Knight v. EbertCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API