Co-Vest Corp. v. Corbett
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT DANIELS, District Judge:
The law that is applicable in this case is governed by Rule 52(a) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. A trial court’s factual findings will be affirmed unless they are clearly erroneous.
The point at issue is the construction of a written document. The document is a receipt of partial payment on a judgment with a promise to terminate a sheriff’s sale and release part of the real estate securing the judgment. The document also includes the following:
This will further acknowledge that you have tendered as full and final settlement the amount of $35,000.00,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Messick v. PHD Trucking Service, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
- Dugger v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by6 opinions
- West Valley City v. Majestic Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- Shields v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
- Brigham City v. Mantua TownCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
- Matter of Estate of JustheimCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- Knight v. EbertCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.