Legal Opinion

Brigham City v. Mantua Town

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 24, 1988No. 860366-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACKSON, Judge:

Appellant Mantua Town (“Mantua”) seeks reversal of a judgment entered by the First Judicial District Court on September 8, 1986, based upon the court’s finding that Mantua breached an agreement made with Brigham City regarding treatment of Mantua’s sewage. Specifically, the district court concluded that Mantua failed to pay agreed-upon monthly sewer fees and failed to install and maintain flow recording equipment. Mantua was ordered to pay $24,108 in arrearages, to install flow recording equipment at manhole 48, and to pay monthly sewer fees equal to monthly rates…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kimball v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Buehner Block Co. v. UWC ASSOCIATESUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Barnes v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  5. Seashores Inc. v. HanceyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rose v. Office of Prof'l ConductUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Brigham City v. Mantua TownCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  3. Fife v. FifeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. OPC v. RoseUtah Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API