Legal Opinion

Ernst v. Chicago Great Western Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1919No. 22,347PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 1; Edward L. Fischer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This is an action for damages against a master for injuries sustained by a workman in using a defective tool.

The plaintiff was a pipe 'fitter in the defendant’s workshop, and in the afternoon of November 30, 1917, he was engaged in placing a steam radiator in position and in connecting a steam pipe therewith. The pipe wrench with which he was making the connection was somewhat worn, and occasionally slipped while being used, and the plaintiff spoke to his foreman about it. Plaintiff testified—

“Q. Did you say anything to Mr. Isaacs concerning…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marsh v. . ChickeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Meador v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Rickel v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Blackmore v. AuerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Lively v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Hernandez v. BachandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. Cheek v. EythSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Fischer v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API