Legal Opinion

Cheek v. Eyth

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1939No. 34,136PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hooh, J.:

This was an action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by failure of defendant employer to furnish safe and proper tools for the use of the plaintiff. The case was tried in the district court of Shawnee county, a jury verdict rendered for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Appellant’s several specifications of error will be stated later, and examined. The principal question is whether, under the particular facts of the case, the defendant is entitled to have recovery barred by application of the doctrine of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Walker v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Gillaspie v. United Iron-works Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. QuinlanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Wurtenberger v. Metropolitan Street-railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fishburn v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Harvey v. PalmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Parker v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Morrison v. Hawkeye Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  5. Crews v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API