Legal Opinion

Leach v. Nelson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement.

Bronson, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note. The plaintiff is a resident of Minneapolis; the defendants reside in the state of Washington. Jurisdiction was secured by attaching certain real estate *1049owned by the defendant A. L. Nelson. The complaint alleges the making of a promissory note for $1,000, secured by a mortgage upon realty in Minneapolis; that at the time of making the note there was a prior mortgage upon such realty; that such mortgage has been foreclosed and absolute title has ripened in the holder thereof, through failure of the defendants to redeem, by reason…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Calvo v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. HanfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Herd v. TuohyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Johns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Fanning v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First Interstate Bank of Fargo, N.A. v. RebarchekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Leach v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Smith v. BlackfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. HuncovskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Bottineau County Bank v. StaffordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API