Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. Huncovsky
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChb-istiaNSON, J.
This is an action to foreclose a chattel mortgage securing the payment of a note in the sum of $750, executed and delivered by the defendant to the plaintiff. The complaint is in the usual *1089form. The defendant in his answer asserted that the note in question was executed and delivered in payment of a certain tractor and plows; that the tractor was sold under an express warranty that the same “was in sound and good working condition and that-the work done thereby would be just as good as a new tractor;” that.such representations and warranties were false and untrue; that upon discovery of their…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Standard Manufacturing Co. v. SlotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Guild v. MoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Putnam v. ProutyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Peckham v. Van BergenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
- Boynton Furnace Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Warne v. FinsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
- Minneapolis Threshing MacHine Co. v. HuncovskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Blasl v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
- Stair v. HibbsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Cummings v. DeleenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.