Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. Huncovsky

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChb-istiaNSON, J.

This is an action to foreclose a chattel mortgage securing the payment of a note in the sum of $750, executed and delivered by the defendant to the plaintiff. The complaint is in the usual *1089form. The defendant in his answer asserted that the note in question was executed and delivered in payment of a certain tractor and plows; that the tractor was sold under an express warranty that the same “was in sound and good working condition and that-the work done thereby would be just as good as a new tractor;” that.such representations and warranties were false and untrue; that upon discovery of their…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Standard Manufacturing Co. v. SlotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Guild v. MoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Putnam v. ProutyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Peckham v. Van BergenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Boynton Furnace Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Warne v. FinsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Minneapolis Threshing MacHine Co. v. HuncovskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Blasl v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Stair v. HibbsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Cummings v. DeleenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API