Legal Opinion

Prodigy Communications Corp. v. Agricultural Excess & Surplus Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided May 30, 2006No. 05-05-00442-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice WHITTINGTON.

Prodigy Communications Corp. appeals a summary judgment in favor of Agricultural Excess & Surplus Insurance Company n/k/a Great American E & S Insurance Company and Great American Insurance Company. In two issues, Prodigy contends the trial judge erred in granting appellees’ summary judgment on the ground that Prodigy failed to give proper notice and that the trial judge erred in limiting Prodigy’s ability to take discovery. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

BACKGROUND

Prodigy is the successor in interest to Flashnet Communications, Inc. Flashnet…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. City of Garland v. Dallas Morning NewsTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Ginsberg v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Prodigy Communications Corp. v. Agricultural Excess & Surplus Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Fiengo v. General Motors Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  3. XL Specialty Insurance v. Financial Industries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  4. Motiva Enterprises, LLC v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  5. Prodigy Communications Corp. v. Agricultural Excess & Surplus Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API