Legal Opinion

Sprint Solutions, Inc. v. iCell Guru, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 20, 2015No. Case No. 15 C 7455PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Daniel G. Martin, Magistrate Judge

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel [1] is granted in all respects except that Plaintiffs’ request to hold Encore Repair Services, LLC in contempt is denied without prejudice. Plaintiffs may re-take a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Encore Repair Services, LLC by 11/10/2015. The Court recommends that Encore Repair Services, LLC be required to pay Plaintiffs’ reasonable fees incurred in connection with their motion to compel. By 11/3/2015, Plaintiffs shall submit itemized documentation of *565their litigation expenses associated with bringing their motion to compel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. HyattCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. O'Toole v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mark Vitalis v. Sun Constructors, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2020
  2. Spiegel v. Official Committee of Unsecured CreditorsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  3. Spiegel v. Official Committee of Unsecured CreditorsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  4. Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. Drive Construction, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API