Sprint Solutions, Inc. v. iCell Guru, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Daniel G. Martin, Magistrate Judge
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel [1] is granted in all respects except that Plaintiffs’ request to hold Encore Repair Services, LLC in contempt is denied without prejudice. Plaintiffs may re-take a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Encore Repair Services, LLC by 11/10/2015. The Court recommends that Encore Repair Services, LLC be required to pay Plaintiffs’ reasonable fees incurred in connection with their motion to compel. By 11/3/2015, Plaintiffs shall submit itemized documentation of *565their litigation expenses associated with bringing their motion to compel…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. HyattCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- O'Toole v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mark Vitalis v. Sun Constructors, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2020
- Spiegel v. Official Committee of Unsecured CreditorsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Spiegel v. Official Committee of Unsecured CreditorsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. Drive Construction, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023